Employment and Support Allocation - Claims and Appeals - The View of a Professional

To be eligible for ESA the applicant should move 15 points threshold. Those that have been denied usually seek advice to appeal their case though fail. However , it is very seldom as far as our experience is concerned never to get the needed 15 points whenever I actually assist my clients in experiencing the test. Follow the link for more information about ESA Phone Number.

Although the decision still lies with all the tribunal there are a few factors which can be regarded in improving the chances of acceptance. First, I deem that it is not advantageous to squeeze out every possible point instead I advise our client to be honest and be realistic when taking the test. It is also of great essence that I believe in the credibility of my client. If on my part I actually already find even a hint of doubt, what more with all the tribunal? It will also help if relevant medical related evidence can be presented although securing them will need a combination of luck and skill. Further, it is worth experiencing the ESA50 enquiry form and the "health care professional" (HCP) file with the client. Analyze what the client composed in his application with all the HCP and what the feedback of the other were. Uncovering factual inaccuracies and correcting it can be helpful in persuading the tribunal they should reevaluate the application.

Meanwhile, I find that majority of the clients who have have scored nil points can pass the independent test to be placed in the "support group". If it gets accepted, the client will be spared of "work-focused interviews" as well as other requirements to carry out "work-related activity" hence avoiding economic sanction. In fact being in the support group represents a financial advantage as opposed to "work related activity group" because the latter is only going to have 12 months entitlement effective April 2012. After which, they can acquire means-tested benefits for example income related ESA, housing benefit or council tax benefit which they might not be able to qualify either if their husband or wife or they have other sources of revenue such as pension or other revenue.

Our concern in most of the appeals is to move the case in to a support group and it is quite gratifying when the decision creator will accept the medical evidence submitted by my client without the need just for tribunal hearing.

At any rate, an element of luck can still be considered if the case is recommended to be place in front of the tribunal where it will probably be heard by 2 panels comprising a tell and a doctor. Because the tribunal is also individual, both may have an alternative approach to the evidence presented to them. Several members may be more even-handed than others and the chance of a favourable outcome boosts. On the other hand, several may struggle with "giving benefit of the doubt" and this can therefore affect the outcome of the case. For more info go to ESA Number.

Write a comment

Comments: 0